**Barely drunk and somewhat nervous, we pick up in the front of the propaganda laden bookshelf**
When Kate expressed her interest in the legalities of teaching ID, Casey’s beady eyes lit up as I imagine they might were he presented with proof of a creator. Like a toddler having just managed to make poopy in the toilet for the first time, he proudly exclaimed that he was a lawyer, and could really, really, honestly for reals tell us anything we wanted to know about the legal issues.
But first, since we were standing here, wouldn’t we like some handouts to take home with us? Some teaching guides, some books he just happened to co-author, maybe a pamphlet or six? Wouldn’t we like copies of several different versions of a thing called “Icons of Evolution”?
Would we EVER.
After our bright eyed and dimwitted host heaped piles of propaganda into our open and willing arms, we kept walking down the hall.
We were walking toward the door, and almost certainly on our way out, when I unthinkingly mentioned the Dover trial.
His eyes lit up, and his expression became some odd combination of excited, predatory, and aroused. He invited us to go have a seat in a small dark room, while he went to get yet another book for us to read, this one one he co-authored on, as luck would have it, the Dover trial.
Sitting in this tiny room, Kate and I were both fairly certain something terrible was about to happen. We were caught. We were caught, and we were trapped, and we had no way out. Something told me that Casey Luskin was the kind of man that eats what he hates, and he no doubt hated us, if he’d figured out the game now.
When he returned, I was coiled and ready to spring. I had an escape plan, and if worst came to worst, I figured, he’s a small guy, and while I’m barely over five foot tall myself, I can hold my own in a dirty back alley type no holds barred fight. I had this.
Of course, all of that was baseless paranoia, as when he came back, he handed us copies of his book and sat down, eager to discuss the case.
The bulk of the conversation was just a rehashing of Luskin’s nonsense statements on the subject, which means it wasn’t terribly interesting. Until Kate said, quietly but with obviously sincere indignation, “But that judge was supposedly a Christian.”
It was like turning on a light switch. Luskin’s face darkened, his brow furrowed, becoming (if possible) even more prehistoric in appearance, and his slightly high pitched whine turned into something much darker, and passionate. With his next sentence, everything you need to know about the difference between their public portrayal of ID and it’s roots in religion, and the reality of the situation, was said.
His tone strident, leaning across the table to get as close as possible, he said “I know! But he wasn’t a real christian, he was a country club christian! I even heard that he referred to his church as his wife’s church. So that explains that. A real christian wouldn’t have sided with the ACLU the way he did. It was sickening.”
At the point, it was no longer hard to keep from laughing. Vomiting, yes, but laughing? There was nothing funny about this. The only thing I could think was “Holy shit, they do exist.”
From that point forward, Luskin explained at length that the judge had lifted entire sections of the decision from a brief by the ACLU, and that, while that wasn’t necessarily illegal, it was obviously immoral and only done to discredit good christians and to keep god out of the classrooms. And that any real christian wouldn’t do any such thing.
Every time he said “the ACLU”, his voice turned into this low hissing sound, and truly, the only way to describe his expression is as that of a zealot.
We sat back, hardly saying a word, almost incapable of believing just how nakedly Luskin was saying all of these things, and that, again, these people exist. They’re not kidding, they’re not elaborate jokes, they exist, and they think this way, and they are pouring large amounts of money, time, and energy into promoting this horrific, anti-science, anti-reality, anti-education worldview.
The conversation from there naturally wound down, and Luskin announced he had to meet his wife for dinner. We were, however, welcome to call or drop by anytime, He ensured that we had his number and email, asked if we knew of any good Indian restaurants in town, and ushered us out the door with a handshake and a genuine smile.
I fully intend to take him up on his kind offer.
September 7, 2008 at 4:35 pm
[standingO]
Brava! Brava!
[/standingO]
September 7, 2008 at 8:09 pm
He has a wife? Whoda thunk it?
I think the best strategy is to point out that liars like Luskin simply reject the most fundamental teachings of Jesus as well as many of the Commandments.
September 7, 2008 at 9:43 pm
I know that every time I excersize my freedoms of whatever I silently curse the ACLU under my breath.
Civil Liberties-loving motherfuckers.
September 8, 2008 at 1:31 am
You are so brave!
September 8, 2008 at 5:18 am
I no longer feel uncomfortable about your deceit, ladies. I am just glad you were able to leave uneaten.
September 8, 2008 at 5:43 am
I’ve had this exact revelation a few times myself. I mean, you know they exist, but it still comes as a shock to encounter one in the flesh, and you can’t quite comprehend that they actually think the things they do. I still can’t comprehend it.
Beautifully written.
September 8, 2008 at 5:44 am
For these IDers, et.al., Jesus is an empty body into which they can project all of their ego-centered, control-loving doctrine. They NEED dichotomy, dualism. If Satan can’t be seen, the ACLU will do. Fear is a greater motivator than Love or Wonder or Hope in their ideological worldview, and laughing at them is, I’m becoming convinced,the most effective approach.
September 8, 2008 at 5:52 am
This exemplifies very well how I feel when I meet one of these people. It’s like they are nto real people, but rather something that makes a very good but not quite perfect attempt to pass off as a real person.
I know that is nonsense, of course, but it is the way I feel.
September 8, 2008 at 5:53 am
Oh, the link I wnated to put did not come out. It was a link to the “Uncanny Valley” artcile in the tvtropes.org.
September 8, 2008 at 6:05 am
I want to party with you guys!…..anytime
September 8, 2008 at 7:02 am
You two, I swear. I envy your moxie. This is a tour de force. Next time I’m coming with you.
September 8, 2008 at 7:29 am
” it was obviously immoral and only done to discredit good christians and to keep god out of the classrooms”
But I thought ID had nothing to do with God!
September 8, 2008 at 7:35 am
Oh Qusan, you know you’re welcome to join me in ANY adventure.
September 8, 2008 at 7:51 am
I feel sorry for the poor guy. He was polite and serving. I disagree with his positions of course but there’s no need IMO to put him down so.
September 8, 2008 at 8:56 am
It’s just a cover. Haggard has one, too.
Word to the wise, the next time someone goes to get a tour of the Disco Institute, bring a voice recorder. Seriously, five minutes of these people speaking off the cuff is worth 15 days of trial testimony. I recommend the iRiver mp3 recorders in case anyone else wants to try. Dang, makes me wish I had a reason to go to Seattle!
September 8, 2008 at 9:31 am
“Every time he said ‘the ACLU’, his voice turned into this low hissing sound, and truly, the only way to describe his expression is as that of a zealot.”
My sister is an evangelical Christian and she hates the ACLU. Maybe this is one of the reasons why as I have never asked her what they do that is so terrible. I guess the ACLU is keeping her god fairy out of the classroom.
September 8, 2008 at 10:45 am
Hasn’t anyone told him that judges using documents like that is standard procedure? What kind of lawyer is he, if he doesn’t even know that?
September 8, 2008 at 12:08 pm
Haha!
This is absolutely fantastic.
September 8, 2008 at 1:35 pm
I am not sure what is so sinister about what Casey Luskin said. Sure, he doesn’t have a high regard for those at the ACLU. So what. Think about some of the rude things that have been said on these blog comments.
September 8, 2008 at 2:50 pm
“These people really exist” reminds me of something that happened to me and two of my friends in college a few years ago. This woman coming off the bus with us tells us we are all Satanists. I asked her why, she said it was because of our black clothing. Black levis and simple t shirts, no Goth makeup chains, etc. Just black. She added that she was a born again Christian, and indicated that this somehow gave her extra sensing abilities…
September 8, 2008 at 7:24 pm
This is so entertaining to read, reads like a comedy sketch.
My right-wing relatives hiss out the name ACLU, too, and they say NAACP the same way.
September 8, 2008 at 7:30 pm
[...] READ THE REST OF THIS ENTRY AT “ENEMY COMBATANT TRAILMIX APPRECIATION CLUB” [...]
September 9, 2008 at 12:38 am
Sweet! Funny, enlightening and wonderful! I owe y’all a drink.
September 9, 2008 at 5:59 am
I’d hug you, but I don’t believe in anything anymore.
September 9, 2008 at 5:14 pm
If you’re ever down in San Diego, you should head to the east county area and do the same at ICR, conveniently located next to the drive in movies, where they presumably perform their research.
September 11, 2008 at 9:43 am
bunnycatch3r wroteI feel sorry for the poor guy. He was polite and serving. I disagree with his positions of course but there’s no need IMO to put him down so.”The poor guy” is among the Disco Institute operatives who came to Ohio to try to cram intelligent design creationism into the state science standards. “The poor guy” regularly writes misrepresentations and falsehoods about science on the comment-free Disco Institute “blog.” “The poor guy” pushes a legal theory of the First Amendment Establishment Clause on behalf of his employer that is contrary to 100 years of Supreme Court jurisprudence, all in aid of a theocratically-inclined religious movement.
Summary: “The poor guy” is not a random schnook: He’s an active and visible member of a profoundly anti-Enlightenment movement that is both well-funded and pernicious.
September 11, 2008 at 9:44 am
Welp, looks like the formatting went all to hell on that one. Sorry, folks.
September 11, 2008 at 10:17 am
Just to add to what RBH said and to answer Steve’s question (#17):
Hasn’t anyone told him that judges using documents like that is standard procedure? What kind of lawyer is he, if he doesn’t even know that?
Yes, he’s been told it many times and is fully aware of it (as long as we grant the likelihood that he has the sentience of an amoeba or above). Luskin is more than willing to lie, at least by omission if not outright, in the name of Jesus.
Which, at the very least, is strong evidence that Jesus cannot hurl lightening bolts.
September 11, 2008 at 12:38 pm
Excellent. Just excellent. Didn’t actually think they had a real brick and mortar location in Seattle. So glad you got in AND got out. Way to go ladies.
Cheers,
Mike
September 12, 2008 at 8:32 pm
Here’s are a couple photos of the Discovery Institute building:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/82216042@N00/2852542488/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/82216042@N00/2851707093/in/photostream/